Museum-quality giclée or canvas print with fast production and flexible finish options. ( Buy Hand Made Painting
Switch to Digital Image)
Pick from our preset sizes that match the artwork's original proportions.
Type the width and the height you need, to fit your frame or your wall. A print can only be cut, never made bigger than the picture, so a size with a different shape loses a part of the image. We send you a digital mockup to approve before we print anything. The picture shown on this page does not show the real cut — only the mockup does.
Worldwide Delivery () in 2 weeks instead of standard 4/5 weeks. (9 November)
One. Number 31, 1950
Reproduction Size
In the pantheon of modern art, few works command the room with such raw, unbridled intensity as Paul Jackson Pollock’s “One: Number 31, 1950.” To stand before this canvas is to witness a moment of pure, unfiltered creation captured in time. As a cornerstone of the Abstract Expressionist movement, this painting transcends the boundaries of traditional composition, offering instead a dense, rhythmic web of energy that seems to pulse with its own internal heartbeat. It is not merely an arrangement of pigment; it is a visceral embodiment of spontaneity and emotion, a radical reimagining of what it means to apply paint to a surface. For the discerning collector or the designer seeking a focal point of profound character, this work offers an unparalleled sense of movement and depth.
The brilliance of the piece lies in its revolutionary technique, famously known as the drip method. Moving away from the controlled constraints of the easel, Pollock laid his canvas horizontally on the floor, allowing him to engage with the work from all sides—a practice often referred to as "action painting." Through a meticulous yet seemingly accidental process of pouring, dripping, and splashing liquid household paint using sticks, knives, and even feathers, he bypassed the traditional brushstroke. This method allowed for a complex layering of textures where tans, blues, and grays interweave with stark blacks and whites. The resulting surface is a labyrinthine network of lines that shimmer with varying degrees of luster, creating an optical experience that shifts as the viewer moves around the piece.
Beyond its technical audacity, “One: Number 31, 1950” serves as a profound window into the artist's psyche. Created during a period of intense experimentation in his East Hampton studio, the painting reflects Pollock’s desire to tap into the subconscious mind. The composition lacks a singular focal point, instead utilizing an "all-over" approach that directs the eye in a continuous, looping journey across the canvas. This lack of hierarchy creates a sense of infinite expansion, mirroring the vast, untamed landscapes of the American West that shaped Pollock’s early life. The subdued, earthy palette, punctuated by sudden, bold splashes of color, speaks to an emotional depth that avoids mere visual spectacle in favor of a more spiritual, primal resonance.
For those looking to integrate such a powerful work into a sophisticated interior, the painting offers a unique versatility. Its complex textures and neutral base tones allow it to anchor a room, providing a sense of historical weight and intellectual intrigue. Whether placed in a minimalist contemporary setting or a more classic, curated gallery space, a high-quality reproduction of this masterpiece brings with it the spirit of 20th-century innovation. It is an invitation to contemplate the beauty found within chaos and to appreciate the enduring legacy of an artist who dared to let the paint dance across the canvas.
The palette of "One. Number 31, 1950" is muted in saturation.
"One. Number 31, 1950" is recorded as iconic among the Abstract Expressionism works in the catalog.
The suggested use for "One. Number 31, 1950" by Paul Jackson Pollock is accent. It can serve other purposes as well.
The story of Paul Jackson Pollock begins in the rugged landscape of Cody, Wyoming, where he was born on January 28, 1912. He was the youngest of five brothers, born to Stella May McClure and LeRoy Pollock. His father worked as a land surveyor, a profession that required constant movement across the vast American West. This nomadic existence meant that the young boy's early years were defined by frequent relocations, a restlessness that seemed to mirror the shifting horizons of his father's work. These early travels through the West provided him with a direct, unmediated encounter with the natural world and the spiritual resonance of Native American art, impressions that would quietly settle into his subconscious long before he ever held a brush.
As he grew, the search for a sense of place led him toward the urban energy of the coast. He enrolled at Manual Arts High School in Los Angeles, seeking a formal structure for his burgeoning impulses. However, the true shaping of his hand occurred much later, when he moved to New York City. It was there, at the Art Students League, that he began a long and transformative period of study. From 1929 to 1942, he labored under the guidance of Thomas Hart Benton. While Benton emphasized rhythmic compositions and the narrative weight of American life, the young student was already beginning to drift toward his own, more abstract, internal truths.
By 1947, a profound shift had taken hold in the way he approached the canvas. He moved away from the traditional easel, choosing instead to lay his canvases directly upon the floor. This change allowed him to stand over his work, becoming part of the creative act itself. He did not merely apply paint; he dripped, splashed, and flung it from above, letting the liquid fall in unpredictable patterns. This method turned the act of painting into a physical performance, where gravity and gesture dictated the final form.
His tools were as unconventional as his methods. He reached for sticks, knives, and even syringes to manipulate the fluid medium. Sometimes he used trowels or dripping fluid paint to achieve specific textures. He would often scratch into the surface or use strange objects to build up a thick crust of paint, adding a tactile, sculptural quality to the work. This process was less about controlled brushwork and more about a rhythmic, almost primal release of energy onto the surface.
As he moved away from the constraints of the easel, his canvases began to reflect a more visceral engagement with the medium. In 1943, he produced Mural, a massive work measuring 8-by-20-foot (2.4 by 6.1 m), which demonstrated his ability to command a vast surface. During this period, his explorations into the subconscious and the act of painting itself led to works like Eyes in the Heat, created about 1946. These pieces were not merely images but records of a physical presence, where the movement of his whole body dictated the placement of every splatter and pool of color.
The years that followed saw him perfecting the rhythmic, all-over compositions that would define his reputation. He sought to create a sense of boundless space, where no single point held dominance over the rest. This approach is evident in Number 1, 1949, a work that captures a raw outpouring of energy, and in Lavender Mist, Number 1, 1950, which remains a significant piece of his output. In these works, the interplay between control and chance creates a delicate balance, as if the paint were released rather than applied.
His later experiments continued to push the boundaries of how paint could be manipulated on a horizontal surface. He often used sticks, knives, or even the cans themselves to fling pigment, resulting in complex networks of lines. This method is clearly seen in Blue Poles, Number 11, 1952 and in the energetic Convergence. Through these works, he achieved a state where the painting seemed to possess a life of its own, emerging from a deep immersion in his own imagination.
The path of his career was shaped by both public necessity and the generosity of a few vital supporters. Between 1938 and 1942, he found steady work as a painter for the WPA Federal Art Project, a period that provided a necessary rhythm to his developing practice. This stability gave way to a more personal and transformative alliance when Peggy Guggenheim offered him a gallery contract in July 1943. Her support proved to be more than professional; in 1945, she provided a $2,000 down payment to help him secure a home, a gesture that deeply intertwined his personal life with his artistic survival.
His creative life eventually found its center in East Hampton, New York. There, within the Pollock-Krasner House and Studio, he lived and worked alongside his wife, Lee Krasner. The studio was a place of intense physical movement, where the boundaries between the artist and the canvas dissolved. He often moved away from the traditional easel, preferring to lay his canvases upon the floor to engage with the paint from all sides. This workspace was not merely a room for production but a site of profound, restless energy where his most radical experiments took place.
The personal life of the artist was deeply intertwined with his creative struggles. In 1945, he married the artist Lee Krasner, a union that provided a significant presence in his life during his most transformative years. Yet, beneath the surface of his professional ascent, a persistent shadow remained. He struggled with an alcohol addiction throughout his entire life, a battle that often complicated his existence and his ability to navigate the pressures of his growing fame.
This internal and external turbulence reached a tragic end in East Hampton, New York, USA. On August 11, 1956, at the age of 44, his life was cut short in a sudden, violent accident. While driving, he was involved in a single-car collision caused by alcohol. The crash proved fatal, leaving behind a legacy that was as tumultuous as the paint he flung across his canvases.
The ripples of his radical methods reached far beyond the studio walls of East Hampton. By breaking the traditional bond between the brush and the easel, he became a central figure in the Abstract Expressionist movement, a shift that fundamentally altered the trajectory of American creativity. His presence helped solidify New York City's position as a global center for modern art, moving the heart of the avant-garde away from European dominance. He was among the first American painters to be recognized as a peer of the great 20th-century European masters, proving that a new, visceral language could emerge from the soil of the United States.
His influence acted as a catalyst for many subsequent art movements that followed in his wake. The way he engaged with the canvas—treating it as an arena for physical action rather than a mere surface for representation—opened doors for many who sought to express the subconscious through gesture. This emphasis on the process of creation itself left a permanent mark on the history of modern art, ensuring that the spontaneous and the unplanned would forever hold a place in the artist's toolkit.
To witness the physical traces of his movement, one must travel to the great institutions that preserved his radical energy. In New York City, the Museum of Modern Art holds several of his canvases, allowing viewers to stand before the sprawling, uncentered compositions that defined his era. The National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. also maintains his works, offering a space to observe the intricate networks of color he achieved through his unique methods. Across the Atlantic, the Tate Gallery in London keeps his presence alive within its collections, ensuring his influence reaches far beyond American shores.
For those seeking a more intimate connection to his process, the Pollock-Krasner House and Studio in East Hampton offers a profound sense of place. This site, a National Historic Landmark, was the space where he and his wife, Lee Krasner, lived and worked. The property remains a vital link to his life, preserving the environment that nurtured his transition from traditional forms to the spontaneous, floor-based methods that changed the course of modern painting. Walking through these spaces provides a sense of the scale and the physical reality of his creative struggle.
1912 - 1956 , United States of America