The artwork displayed on this page is protected by copyright law, which means we cannot legally create or sell an identical reproduction. This protection is enforced under international agreements such as the Berne Convention and by national laws, including those outlined by the U.S. Copyright Law - Title 17.
As a respectful and legal alternative, we offer custom, hand-painted artworks inspired by the original. Our skilled and professional artists carefully study the original's style, mood, and artistic essence to create a new, unique piece that evokes the same feeling - while remaining an original creation in its own right.
This method fully complies with copyright regulations because it does not involve copying or duplicating the protected artwork. Instead, it is a creative reinterpretation - a new painting that is influenced by the original but not identical to it.
Hand-painted oil on canvas in your size and frame, made to order by our artists. ( Switch to Print
Switch to Digital Image)
Pick from our preset sizes that match the artwork's original proportions.
Type the width and the height you need, to fit your frame or your wall. This is hand-painted, so for a size with a different shape the artist can paint a bit more around the picture, or cut a bit — you choose. We send you a digital mockup to approve before the painting starts. The picture shown on this page does not show the real result — only the mockup does.
Worldwide Delivery () in 3/4 weeks instead of standard 5 weeks. (18 October). No compromise on quality.
mao91
Reproduction Size
Andy Warhol's ‘Mao 91’, part of his larger 1972 series, is far more than just a portrait; it’s a seismic cultural statement. Emerging from the backdrop of shifting geopolitical landscapes and burgeoning Pop Art sensibilities, this screenprint boldly confronts notions of celebrity, power, and mass production. The image itself—a close-up of Mao Zedong's face rendered in striking shades of yellow and pink against a vibrant red background—immediately commands attention. It’s an appropriation of official propaganda, stripped of its intended reverence and recast through Warhol’s signature lens of cool detachment. The choice to focus on Mao, a figure largely inaccessible and mysterious to Western audiences at the time, was deliberately provocative. The slight distortion and repetition inherent in the screenprinting process further destabilize the image, preventing it from becoming a straightforward glorification.
Warhol’s embrace of silkscreen printing wasn't merely a stylistic choice; it was integral to his artistic philosophy. Having honed his skills in commercial illustration, he understood the power of reproduction and its ability to democratize imagery. The screenprint process, with its inherent mechanical quality, perfectly mirrored the mass-produced nature of consumer culture that Warhol so keenly observed and documented. In ‘Mao 91’, this technique takes on an added layer of meaning. By replicating Mao’s image—an icon meticulously crafted by a totalitarian regime—Warhol subtly critiques the very mechanisms of control and manipulation inherent in propaganda. The slight imperfections, the variations in color density, all serve to undermine the authority of the original portrait, transforming it into a commodity, another object for consumption within the burgeoning art market.
The early 1970s were a period of dramatic change. President Nixon’s historic visit to China in 1972—a watershed moment that began to thaw decades of Cold War hostility—provided the immediate impetus for Warhol's series. However, the work also reflects broader anxieties about American political culture and the pervasive influence of media imagery. Warhol wasn’t necessarily making a political statement *about* Mao or China; rather, he was using Mao as a symbol – a readily recognizable face to explore themes of power, celebrity, and the blurring lines between art and commerce. He saw parallels between the cult of personality surrounding Mao and the idolization of Hollywood stars, suggesting that both were products of carefully constructed narratives and mass dissemination. The vibrant color palette—a departure from the more somber tones typically associated with political imagery—further emphasizes this sense of detachment and ironic commentary.
‘Mao 91’ continues to resonate today because it taps into fundamental questions about image, power, and perception. The work challenges us to consider how images are constructed, circulated, and ultimately consumed. It's a reminder that even the most seemingly authoritative representations can be deconstructed and recontextualized. For interior designers, a reproduction of ‘Mao 91’ offers a bold statement piece—a conversation starter that injects a dose of intellectual energy into any space. Its striking colors and iconic imagery make it a versatile addition to both contemporary and modern settings. More than just an aesthetic object, Warhol's 'Mao 91' is a potent symbol of the 20th century’s complex relationship with politics, celebrity, and the ever-expanding reach of mass media.
Behind "mao91" stand Andy Warhol and the Pop Art movement.
"mao91" by Andy Warhol has a gentle luminance luminance. Luminance describes how much light the colors appear to reflect.
"mao91" is a work of Pop Art. The movement indicates the artistic tradition the work is part of.
Born Andrew Warhola Jr. in 1928 within the industrial landscape of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the man who would become Andy Warhol spent much of his early years shaped by confinement and quiet observation. A childhood bout with Sydenham's chorea, or St. Vitus’ Dance, kept him indoors for long stretches. During these periods, he turned to the imagery provided by his mother: comic books and movie magazines. These were the first seeds of a visual vocabulary that would later embrace the mass-produced. He eventually moved toward formal training at the Carnegie Institute of Technology, earning a degree in Pictorial Design in 1949.
His arrival in New York City marked a transition from the private world of sketches to the public sphere of commercial illustration. Working for names such as Tiffany & Co., Vogue, and Harper's Bazaar, he mastered the precision required by advertising. This period of professional service instilled in him an understanding of how images are manufactured and distributed. He learned the mechanics of the brand before he ever attempted to deconstruct it.
By the 1960s, his focus shifted from illustrating products to treating the products themselves as subjects. Through the adoption of the silkscreen printing process, he introduced a method that mirrored the repetitive nature of consumer culture. This technique allowed for a detachment from the hand of the artist, favoring a flattened, mechanical aesthetic. His studio, known as The Factory, became a central point for a specific New York social circle. It was a space where musicians, poets, and film personalities gathered, often blurring the lines between their private lives and their public personas.
His work during these years explored several distinct themes:
This era was not without physical consequence. In 1968, a radical feminist writer named Valerie Solanas entered his Manhattan studio and shot him, leaving him with lasting injuries. This event altered the trajectory of his studio life, moving it toward a more business-oriented enterprise.
Beyond the canvas, Warhol was an active filmmaker who produced over 600 films between 1963 and 1968. Many of these were experimental or static in nature. He utilized long, unblinking takes in works like Sleep and Empire to challenge how an audience consumes moving images. His filmic output often featured his "superstars," a group of personalities from the Factory scene who became part of the cultural fabric of the time.
His influence reached into the music industry through his management of The Velvet Underground. He even designed the famous banana cover for their debut album, further merging the boundaries between fine art and popular media. By the time of his death in 1987, he had moved through various media—photography, publishing, and television—leaving behind a body of work that interrogated the very nature of what it means to be seen in a media-saturated age.
1928 - 1987 , United States of America