Žymiausias John Dee tapas yra Obsidian Mirror (1400). Kartu su Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) ir Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582) tai sudaro tris visai visus pažįstančius darbus. Mūsų kataloge yra 4 darbų autoriaus John Dee; žemiau pateiktos 4 daugiausia visame pasaulyje žiūrimų kūrinių, kiekvieno iš jų – su metai, muziejumi, kuriame jis saugomas, ir paaiškintu, kodėl jis svarbus.
Rangos vieta nulegiama pagal mūsų populiarumumo balas, kurį sudaro kiekvieno kūrinio paieškos, apsilankėjimai ir užsakėjimai. Atnaujinta lapkritis 2026. Kiekvieną šio puslapio šedevrą galite užsisakyti kaip muziejoriaus kokybės rankų darbo alievinę reprodukciją arba aukščiausios kokybės meninį spausdiną jūsų pasirinktu dydžiu.
23 metų kūryba John Dee: nuo 1560 iki 1582, metis metai – garsiausi kiekvienų metų paveiksliai chronologine tvarka.
Obsidian Mirror (1400). Toliau eina Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) ir Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Mūsų kataloge yra 4 John Dee darbų, datuojamų nuo 1560 iki 1582.
1582 laikotarpyje: 2 iš 4 šioje pusėje esančių darbų sukurtos tada, iš jų – Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks.
Pirmasis šioje pusėje yra Four Castles Gold Disk (1560), paskutinis – Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Taip. Kiekvieną šioje pusėje esantį paveikslą galite užsakyti kaip muziejoriaus kokybės rankų darbų alievinę kopiją arba aukščiausios kokybės spausdinį pasirinktu jūsų pageidaujamu dydžiu tiesiai iš paties paveikslą puslapio.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist, a man whose intellectual reach extended far beyond the boundaries of traditional scholarship. Born on 13 July 1527, he occupied a space between rigorous science and the esoteric. His lineage began with his father, Rowland Dee, providing the foundation for a life defined by the pursuit of hidden knowledge. He was not a painter or a visual creator, but a thinker whose influence was felt through his vast intellectual inquiries and his involvement in the occult sciences of the sixteenth century.
Family life for Dee was marked by specific, documented connections that anchored his complex existence. His son, Arthur Dee, was born on 13 July 1579. This lineage continued through a life spent largely in Mortlake, London, where he maintained his residence and his extensive collections. The weight of his intellectual pursuits often intersected with his personal associations, creating a life that was as much about human relationships as it was about the study of the unknown.
The end of his life remains a matter of slight historical debate, with records suggesting he died in 1608 or 1609. Regardless of the exact year, the impact of his work remains a concrete part of the history of English intellectualism. He left behind a legacy of manuscripts and tracts, including the Cotton Vitellius C. VII, which serves as a primary record of his own life and thoughts. His existence was defined by this tension between the documented word and the unseen forces he sought to understand.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist whose influence relied heavily on his ability to navigate the complex social and intellectual circles of the European continent. His movements were not mere sightseeing; they were strategic engagements with the power structures of the era. He was a visitor to the court of Rudolf II, a connection that placed him at the center of significant intellectual exchange. This relationship was solidified during his time in Prague, where he visited the court of Rudolf II between 1584 and 1585. These interactions demonstrate a man deeply embedded in the high-stakes political and esoteric currents of the late sixteenth century.
His social network was as diverse as it was specialized. He maintained a close friendship with Edward Kelley, a relationship that likely defined much of his later intellectual pursuits. Beyond these personal ties, Dee moved through a web of associates and acquaintances that spanned various social strata. He was connected to William of Rosenberg and Nicholas Starkie, figures who represent the breadth of his professional and social reach. These were not casual acquaintances but part of a structured existence defined by proximity to power and the exchange of specialized knowledge. His presence in Prague and his ties to the court of Rudolf II confirm that his work was never isolated to a single locale, but was instead part of a broader, continental dialogue.