FREE ART CONSULTATION

x

Edward Armitage

1817 - 1896

Quick Facts

  • Copyright status: Public domain
  • Born: 1817
  • Museums on APS:
    • The Royal Society
    • The Royal Society
    • Guildhall Art Gallery
    • Walker Art Gallery
    • Guildhall Art Gallery
  • Works on APS: 25
  • Died: 1896
  • Top-ranked work: The Festival of Esther
  • More…
  • Also known as: Edward Armitage Ra
  • Lifespan: 79 years
  • Creative periods: mature period
  • Art period: 19th Century
  • Top 3 works:
    • The Festival of Esther
    • The Christian Martyr
    • Deputation to Faraday

Art Quiz

There is only one correct answer for each question.

Question 1:
What was Edward Armitage known for?
Question 2:
Where did Edward Armitage receive his artistic training?
Question 3:
Who mentored Edward Armitage at the École des Beaux-Arts?
Question 4:
What prominent project did Armitage contribute to in Westminster Palace?

Early Life and Family Roots

Edward Armitage, born in London on May 20th, 1817, emerged from a background steeped in the burgeoning industrial wealth of Yorkshire. Though his initial years were spent within the capital’s confines, his lineage was firmly anchored in the north of England, specifically to the Armitage family of Farnley Hall, just south of Leeds. His father, James Armitage, was a prominent ironmaster, one of seven sons descended from a line that had acquired Farnley Hall in 1799. This familial foundation—a blend of established land ownership and entrepreneurial spirit—would subtly shape the artist’s trajectory, providing both opportunity and a degree of independence.

The Armitage family's involvement extended beyond ironworks; his brother, Thomas Rhodes Armitage, notably founded the Royal National Institute of the Blind, demonstrating a commitment to social betterment. This sense of purpose, though not directly artistic, resonates within the often-grand and morally weighty themes that would come to define Edward’s work. He was connected through family to several notable figures including Robert Armitage (MP) and Robert Selby Armitage.

Artistic Formation in Paris

Recognizing his son's inclination towards art, James Armitage supported Edward’s pursuit of formal training, leading him to Paris in 1837. The École des Beaux-Arts became the crucible where young Armitage honed his skills under the tutelage of Paul Delaroche, a history painter at the zenith of his fame. Delaroche's influence proved profound; he instilled in Armitage a meticulous draughtsmanship, a dedication to historical accuracy, and a penchant for dramatic narrative—qualities that would become hallmarks of his style.

Armitage wasn’t merely a student but an active participant in Delaroche’s ambitious projects. He was selected as one of four assistants tasked with the monumental fresco *Hémicycle* within the Palais des Beaux-Arts, even reputedly serving as a model for the head of Masaccio—a testament to his developing physical presence and artistic aptitude. His early Parisian works, such as *Prometheus Bound* (1842), already hinted at the power he would later wield, earning praise for its skillful execution but also noted for an almost “brutally energetic” quality.

The Westminster Palace Competitions and Early Success

Returning to London in 1843, Armitage entered a period of intense competition with the ambitious project to decorate the new Palace of Westminster. Following the devastating fire of 1834, Queen Victoria’s consort, Prince Albert, spearheaded an initiative to adorn the rebuilt Houses of Parliament with frescoes depicting scenes from British history and literary masterpieces—Spenser, Shakespeare, and Milton being key sources of inspiration.

The ensuing cartoon competitions were fiercely contested. Armitage quickly distinguished himself, securing first prizes for *The Landing of Julius Caesar in Britain* (1843) and later for *The Spirit of Religion* (1845). While these designs weren’t ultimately realized as frescoes—a consequence of the technical challenges inherent in the London climate—they established his reputation and led to commissions for two significant works within the Poets' Gallery: *The Thames and its Tributaries* (from Pope) and *The Death of Marmion* (from Scott). These early successes, coupled with the Queen’s purchase of his large-scale oil painting *The Battle of Meeanee* (1847), cemented Armitage’s position within the Victorian art world.

A Career Defined by Historical Grandeur

Following a period of study in Rome, Armitage consistently exhibited at the Royal Academy from 1848 until 1893. His oeuvre became characterized by large-scale historical and biblical paintings—works that demanded both technical skill and an understanding of complex narratives. *Retribution* (1858), now housed in the Leeds Museum, stands as a particularly striking example; its allegorical depiction of the suppression of the Indian Mutiny, embodied in a colossal female figure grappling with a tiger, exemplifies his dramatic flair and moral seriousness.

His travels during the Crimean War informed paintings like *The Bottom of the Ravine at Inkerman* (1856) and *Souvenir of Scutari*, demonstrating an engagement with contemporary events. However, it was his ability to translate grand historical themes—such as *Samson* (1851) and *Hagar* (1852)—into visually compelling narratives that truly defined his artistic legacy.

Legacy and Historical Significance

Edward Armitage’s career unfolded within a Victorian art landscape increasingly fascinated by historical spectacle and moral allegory. While he consciously emulated the style of Paul Delaroche, his work also reflects a uniquely British sensibility—a blend of meticulous detail, dramatic composition, and a commitment to narrative clarity.

Though his frescoes proved vulnerable to the ravages of time, Armitage’s oil paintings continue to captivate viewers with their scale, ambition, and technical mastery. He represents a significant figure in Victorian art, bridging the gap between academic tradition and a growing interest in contemporary events. His dedication to “high purposes,” as one critic noted, irrespective of immediate reward, underscores his enduring appeal—a testament to an artist who sought not merely to depict history but to imbue it with meaning and moral weight.