John Dees mest kjente maleri er Obsidian Mirror (1400). Sammen med Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) og Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582) utgjør de de tre verkene som alle kjenner igjen. Vår katalog inneholder 4 verk av John Dee; de 4 nedenfor er de som verden ser mest på, hver med årstall, museet som huser verket og hvorfor det er betydningsfullt.
Rangert etter vår popularitetsscore, som kombinerer søk, besøk og bestillinger for hvert verk. Oppdatert November 2026. Hvert mesterverk på denne siden kan bestilles som en håndmalt oljereproduksjon av museumskvalitet eller som et kunsttrykk, i den størrelsen du velger.
23 års arbeid av John Dee, fra 1560 til 1582, år for år: de mest kjente maleriene fra hvert år, i kronologisk rekkefølge.
Obsidian Mirror (1400). Deretter følger Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) og Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Vår katalog inneholder 4 verk av John Dee, datert fra 1560 til 1582.
I 1582: 2 av de 4 verkene på denne siden er fra denne perioden, inkludert Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks.
Det eldste på denne siden er Four Castles Gold Disk (1560), det nyeste Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Ja. Hvert maleri på denne siden kan bestilles som en håndmalt oljereproduksjon av museumskvalitet eller som et kunsttrykk i ønsket størrelse, direkte fra maleriets egen side.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist, a man whose intellectual reach extended far beyond the boundaries of traditional scholarship. Born on 13 July 1527, he occupied a space between rigorous science and the esoteric. His lineage began with his father, Rowland Dee, providing the foundation for a life defined by the pursuit of hidden knowledge. He was not a painter or a visual creator, but a thinker whose influence was felt through his vast intellectual inquiries and his involvement in the occult sciences of the sixteenth century.
Family life for Dee was marked by specific, documented connections that anchored his complex existence. His son, Arthur Dee, was born on 13 July 1579. This lineage continued through a life spent largely in Mortlake, London, where he maintained his residence and his extensive collections. The weight of his intellectual pursuits often intersected with his personal associations, creating a life that was as much about human relationships as it was about the study of the unknown.
The end of his life remains a matter of slight historical debate, with records suggesting he died in 1608 or 1609. Regardless of the exact year, the impact of his work remains a concrete part of the history of English intellectualism. He left behind a legacy of manuscripts and tracts, including the Cotton Vitellius C. VII, which serves as a primary record of his own life and thoughts. His existence was defined by this tension between the documented word and the unseen forces he sought to understand.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist whose influence relied heavily on his ability to navigate the complex social and intellectual circles of the European continent. His movements were not mere sightseeing; they were strategic engagements with the power structures of the era. He was a visitor to the court of Rudolf II, a connection that placed him at the center of significant intellectual exchange. This relationship was solidified during his time in Prague, where he visited the court of Rudolf II between 1584 and 1585. These interactions demonstrate a man deeply embedded in the high-stakes political and esoteric currents of the late sixteenth century.
His social network was as diverse as it was specialized. He maintained a close friendship with Edward Kelley, a relationship that likely defined much of his later intellectual pursuits. Beyond these personal ties, Dee moved through a web of associates and acquaintances that spanned various social strata. He was connected to William of Rosenberg and Nicholas Starkie, figures who represent the breadth of his professional and social reach. These were not casual acquaintances but part of a structured existence defined by proximity to power and the exchange of specialized knowledge. His presence in Prague and his ties to the court of Rudolf II confirm that his work was never isolated to a single locale, but was instead part of a broader, continental dialogue.