Papir

Veiledning for studentkunst

Untitled (scarf design D )

Navn Klasse Dato

Dwinell Grant, Untitled (scarf design D ) (1948). Gjengitt i illustrasjonsøyemed; alle rettigheter forbeholdt rettighetshaver.

Fakta om verket

Kunstner
Dwinell Grant wahooart.com/no/artists/dwinell-grant/
Kunstnerens datoer
1912 – 1991
Malt
1948
Opprinnelig størrelse
49 x 49 cm

I sammenheng

Untitled (scarf design D ) — Dwinell Grant

Hvor stor er den?

Originalen måler 49 × 49 cm (høyde × bredde), vist her ved siden av en voksen person med gjennomsnittlig høyde.

Når ble dette malt?

  1. 1910
  2. 1920
  3. 1930
  4. 1940
  5. 1950
  6. 1960
  7. 1970
  8. 1980
  9. 1990

Skyggelagt: livsløpet til Dwinell Grant (1912–1991) ▲ dette verket, 1948

Sammenlign med

Velg ett av verkene ovenfor: nevn to ting det har til felles med dette, og én ting som er annerledes.

Flere verk som kan stå ved siden av dette: wahooart.com/no/art/similar/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/

Farger

Målt ut fra bildet

    Hovedfarge

    Espresso #342b29

    Katalogisert palett

    • #342B29
    • #976B58
    • #F7F5F3
    • #677299
    Palett
    Earthy Den dominerende fargefamilien i bildet.
    Hovedfargenavn
    Espresso
    Intensitet
    Balanced Hvor mettede og varierte fargene er, fra en enkelt dempet nyanse til mange klare toner.
    Kontrast
    Gentle Hvor mye fargene varierer i lyshet og metning over hele bildet.
    Harmoni
    Unified Palette Hvor godt fargene fungerer sammen, fra kontrastfylt til fullstendig harmonisk.
    Lysstyrke
    Balanced Hvor lyst eller mørkt bildet fremstår totalt sett, fra dype skygger til lyse høylys.
    Metning
    Balanced Soft Hvor rene og sterke fargene er, fra nesten grått til helt livlige.

    Kunstner og museum

    Kunstner

    Dwinell Grant

    Født i Springfield, United States of America

    A Pioneer of Abstract Film: The Life and Work of Dwinell Grant

    Dwinell Grant, born Clarence Dwinell Grant in Springfield, Ohio, in 1912, emerged as a quietly revolutionary figure in the landscape of 20th-century art. Though perhaps not a household name, his pioneering explorations into abstract art film laid crucial groundwork for generations of experimental filmmakers and expanded the very definition of artistic expression. Grant’s journey began with traditional foundations – an early education in landscape painting under the tutelage of his grandfather, Paul Emilio Henking, instilled within him a deep appreciation for visual language. This initial immersion in representational art would later serve as a springboard for a radical departure into non-objective forms. In 1931, he formally enrolled at the Dayton Art Institute, where the burgeoning currents of modernism and abstraction began to exert their influence, subtly reshaping his artistic sensibilities. A subsequent move to New York City in 1933 and enrollment at the National Academy of Design further refined his skills and broadened his exposure to the avant-garde movements sweeping across the art world.

    From Painting to Motion: The Genesis of ‘Contrathemis’

    Grant's path wasn’t a direct trajectory from canvas to celluloid. A position as an instructor in art and dramatics at Wittenberg College in Ohio, beginning in 1935, proved unexpectedly pivotal. While the demands of teaching limited his time for painting, directing student productions ignited a creative spark, offering an outlet for innovative ideas that transcended traditional artistic boundaries. It was during this period that Grant began to envision art not as static image but as dynamic experience—a vision fueled by experimentation with stage sets and lighting effects. Despite facing some resistance to his avant-garde approaches at Wittenberg, encouragement from colleagues at the Dayton Art Institute led him to seek support from Hilla Rebay, the influential director of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. Rebay’s belief in Grant's potential was instrumental, providing crucial financial assistance that enabled him to pursue his ambitious filmmaking endeavors between 1938 and 1941. This period culminated in his most significant achievement: Contrathemis, an animated production of remarkable originality. The film, characterized by its short, silent format and abstract aesthetic, was a groundbreaking exploration of form, color, and motion—a visual poem constructed from thousands of meticulously crafted drawings.

    Influences and Artistic Development

    The artistic lineage informing Grant’s work is rich and diverse. Modernism, with its rejection of representational conventions, provided the initial impetus for his exploration of abstraction. The dramatic arts, honed through his teaching experience, instilled a sense of theatricality and dynamism in his visual compositions. Perhaps most importantly, the encouragement of fellow artists and patrons like Hilla Rebay proved essential to nurturing his experimental spirit. Grant’s aesthetic sensibilities were also deeply rooted in an interest in Gestalt psychology and the origins of visual communication—a fascination that led him to develop concepts such as “graphic theme structure” and “thematic counterpoint,” which he applied both to his films and his paintings. He didn't simply aim to depict reality; he sought to create a new visual language, one based on fundamental principles of perception and organization. His work often incorporated collage elements and focused on geometric abstraction, resulting in visually striking and intellectually stimulating pieces that challenged conventional notions of artistic beauty.

    Later Years and Lasting Legacy

    The outbreak of World War II marked a shift in Grant’s career trajectory. In 1942, he transitioned to working for a film company, contributing his talents to the war effort by producing Navy training films. He subsequently applied his artistic skills to scientific illustration and filmmaking within the medical profession—a pragmatic application of his visual expertise. While these professional commitments provided financial stability, they also meant fewer opportunities to exhibit his personal creative work. Nevertheless, Grant’s impact on the art world remained significant. His contributions laid important groundwork for experimental animation and abstract film, influencing countless artists who followed in his footsteps. Today, his work is held in the permanent collections of prestigious institutions including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Guggenheim, and the Smithsonian American Art Museum—a testament to his enduring legacy as a notable figure in 20th-century art history. Dwinell Grant’s story serves as a reminder that true artistic innovation often lies at the intersection of disciplines, and that even seemingly abstract explorations can have profound and lasting cultural significance.

    Les mer her

    Finn denne på nett

    QR-kode som lenker til nedlastingssiden for Untitled (scarf design D )

    wahooart.com/no/art/download/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/

    Kildehenvisning for dette kunstverket

    MLA
    Grant, Dwinell. Untitled (scarf design D ). 1948, https://wahooart.com/no/art/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/
    APA
    Grant, Dwinell (1948). Untitled (scarf design D ) [Painting]. https://wahooart.com/no/art/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/
    Chicago
    Dwinell Grant. Untitled (scarf design D ). 1948. https://wahooart.com/no/art/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/
    Harvard
    Grant, Dwinell (1948) Untitled (scarf design D ). Available at: https://wahooart.com/no/art/dwinell-grant-untitled-scarf-design-d-AQZTRP-en/

    Se nøye etter

    Untitled (scarf design D ) — Dwinell Grant

    Se nærmere etter

    Svar med egne ord. Det finnes ingen feil svar her – bare svar du kan forklare.

    1. Hva fanger blikket ditt først, og hvorfor?
    2. Hvilke farger eller former skaper stemningen – og hva er den stemningen?
    3. Se tilbake på Untitled (scarf design E ) (1948), tidligere i denne guiden. Nevn to ting den har til felles med dette verket, og én ting som er annerledes.
    4. Dwinell Grant var omtrent 36 da dette ble laget. Hva i verket bærer preg av å være skapt av en kunstner i den fasen?
    5. Hva kan kunstneren ha ønsket at du skulle føle?

    Ditt svar

    Skriv et kort avsnitt om dette kunstverket. Bruk fakta fra de tidligere delene av denne guiden og svarene dine ovenfor.