Het beroemdste schilderij van John Dee is Obsidian Mirror (1400). Met Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) en Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582) wordt de trilogie van de drie werken die iedereen herkent voltooid. Onze catalogus bevat 4 werken van John Dee; de 4 hieronder zijn de werken die de wereld het meest bekijkt, elk met het jaartal, het museum waar het zich bevindt en de reden waarom het belangrijk is.
Gerangschikt op basis van onze populariteitsscore, die de zoekopdrachten, bezoeken en bestellingen voor elk werk combineert. Bijgewerkt in november 2026. Elk meesterwerk op deze pagina kan worden besteld als een handgeschilderde olieverfreproductie van museumkwaliteit of als een fine art print, in de door u gekozen afmeting.
23 jaar aan werk van John Dee, van 1560 tot 1582, jaar voor jaar: de beroemdste schilderijen van elk jaar, in chronologische volgorde.
Obsidian Mirror (1400). Daarna volgen Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) en Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Onze catalogus bevat 4 werken van John Dee, gedateerd van 1560 tot 1582.
In 1582: 2 van de 4 werken op deze pagina dateren uit die periode, waaronder Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks.
De oudste op deze pagina is Four Castles Gold Disk (1560), de nieuwste Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Ja. Elk schilderij op deze pagina kan worden besteld als een handgeschilderde olieverfreproductie van museumkwaliteit of als een fine art print, in de door u gekozen afmeting, via de eigen pagina van het schilderij.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist, a man whose intellectual reach extended far beyond the boundaries of traditional scholarship. Born on 13 July 1527, he occupied a space between rigorous science and the esoteric. His lineage began with his father, Rowland Dee, providing the foundation for a life defined by the pursuit of hidden knowledge. He was not a painter or a visual creator, but a thinker whose influence was felt through his vast intellectual inquiries and his involvement in the occult sciences of the sixteenth century.
Family life for Dee was marked by specific, documented connections that anchored his complex existence. His son, Arthur Dee, was born on 13 July 1579. This lineage continued through a life spent largely in Mortlake, London, where he maintained his residence and his extensive collections. The weight of his intellectual pursuits often intersected with his personal associations, creating a life that was as much about human relationships as it was about the study of the unknown.
The end of his life remains a matter of slight historical debate, with records suggesting he died in 1608 or 1609. Regardless of the exact year, the impact of his work remains a concrete part of the history of English intellectualism. He left behind a legacy of manuscripts and tracts, including the Cotton Vitellius C. VII, which serves as a primary record of his own life and thoughts. His existence was defined by this tension between the documented word and the unseen forces he sought to understand.
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist whose influence relied heavily on his ability to navigate the complex social and intellectual circles of the European continent. His movements were not mere sightseeing; they were strategic engagements with the power structures of the era. He was a visitor to the court of Rudolf II, a connection that placed him at the center of significant intellectual exchange. This relationship was solidified during his time in Prague, where he visited the court of Rudolf II between 1584 and 1585. These interactions demonstrate a man deeply embedded in the high-stakes political and esoteric currents of the late sixteenth century.
His social network was as diverse as it was specialized. He maintained a close friendship with Edward Kelley, a relationship that likely defined much of his later intellectual pursuits. Beyond these personal ties, Dee moved through a web of associates and acquaintances that spanned various social strata. He was connected to William of Rosenberg and Nicholas Starkie, figures who represent the breadth of his professional and social reach. These were not casual acquaintances but part of a structured existence defined by proximity to power and the exchange of specialized knowledge. His presence in Prague and his ties to the court of Rudolf II confirm that his work was never isolated to a single locale, but was instead part of a broader, continental dialogue.