Papierformaat

Gids voor studentenkunst

Mercury

Naam Klas Datum

corneille van clève, Mercury. Publiek domein

De feiten

Kunstenaar
corneille van clève wahooart.com/nl/artists/corneille-van-cleve/
Geboortedatum en -overlijden kunstenaar
1645 – 1732

In context

Mercury — corneille van clève

Wanneer zou dit geschilderd kunnen zijn?

  1. 1640
  2. 1650
  3. 1660
  4. 1670
  5. 1680
  6. 1690
  7. 1700
  8. 1710
  9. 1720
  10. 1730

Shaded: het leven van corneille van clève (1645–1732)

Voor deze opname is geen exacte datum bekend — uitgaande van de levensloop van de artiest en de stijl van het werk, in welk decennium zou u dit plaatsen?

Vergelijkbare werken

  • Holy Family wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-holy-family-8XZCJH-en/
  • Polyphemus wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-polyphemus-9DGK9A-en/
  • Psyche Scopre Cupido wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-psyche-scopre-cupido-9DGK9D-en/

Kies een van de bovenstaande werken: noem twee overeenkomsten met dit werk en één verschil.

Meer werken om naast dit werk te plaatsen: wahooart.com/nl/art/similar/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/

Kleurenpalet

Gemeten op basis van de afbeelding

    Hoofdkleur

    Rosy Brown #aba89a

    Gecatalogiseerd palet

    • #ABA89A
    • #2C3320
    • #DCDDDB
    • #5C6243
    Palet
    Neutrals De dominante kleurfamilie in de afbeelding.
    Naam hoofdkleur
    Rosy Brown
    Intensiteit
    Monochromatic De mate van verzadiging en variatie in de kleuren, variërend van een enkele ingetogen tint tot vele heldere kleuren.
    Contrast
    Statement De mate waarin de kleuren in helderheid en verzadiging variëren over het gehele kunstwerk.
    Harmonie
    Strong Color Unity De mate waarin de kleuren samensmelten, van contrasterend tot volledig harmonieus.
    Helderheid
    Bright Hoe licht of donker het beeld in zijn geheel oogt, van diepe schaduw tot helder hoogtepunt.
    Verzadiging
    Muted Hoe puur en krachtig de kleuren zijn, van bijna grijs tot volledig levendig.

    Kunstenaar en museum

    Kunstenaar

    corneille van clève

    Geboren in Paris, France

    Jan Griffier I: A London Observer of the Late Stuart Era

    Jan Griffier I, born in Amsterdam around 1645 and passing away in London in 1718, stands as a fascinating figure in the history of Dutch art. Initially apprenticed to a carpenter, tile painter, and flower artist – a common path for young artists seeking foundational skills – Griffier’s trajectory took an unexpected turn when he found himself drawn to the burgeoning artistic scene of London. His life story is one of adaptation, observation, and ultimately, a unique synthesis of influences that produced a distinctive style deeply rooted in both Dutch traditions and the vibrant atmosphere of 17th-century England. Walpole's accounts highlight his early studies under Roelant Roghman, an etcher and landscape painter, alongside informal mentorships with Adriaen van de Velde, Jacob van Ruisdael, and even, controversially, Rembrandt himself – a testament to Griffier’s keen eye for artistic excellence. This diverse learning environment laid the groundwork for his later development as a skilled artist and accomplished printmaker.

    London Years: Capturing a Changing City

    Griffier's relocation to London in the aftermath of the Great Fire of 1666 proved pivotal, not only for his personal life but also for his artistic output. He quickly established himself as a keen observer and recorder of the city’s transformation – a process vividly documented in numerous paintings that offer invaluable insights into London’s architecture, social life, and evolving landscape. These works are characterized by a meticulous attention to detail, a refined sense of perspective, and a subtle use of color that reflects the changing fashions of the time. His depictions of landmarks like Hampton Court Palace and Syon House, rendered with both realism and a touch of imaginative embellishment, showcase his ability to blend factual representation with artistic license. Notably, Griffier’s paintings often feature small figures and domestic scenes, adding layers of narrative and human interest to the urban vistas. The “A Turkey and other Fowl in a Park” (1710), now housed at the Tate Gallery, exemplifies this approach – a charmingly detailed depiction of London life interwoven with fantastical elements, reflecting a broader trend in his later work.

    Printmaking and Portraiture: Expanding Artistic Horizons

    Beyond painting, Griffier was a highly accomplished printmaker, producing a series of meticulously executed plates after Francis Barlow’s bird illustrations and creating portraits based on the styles of Peter Lely and Godfrey Kneller. His mezzotints, in particular, demonstrate his technical mastery and his ability to capture subtle nuances of expression. These prints reveal a remarkable understanding of tonal values and texture, showcasing his versatility as an artist across different media. The inclusion of portraiture within his oeuvre further broadened his artistic scope, allowing him to experiment with various techniques and styles while simultaneously catering to the demands of a discerning clientele.

    Influences and Style: A Hybrid Vision

    Griffier’s style is remarkably complex, reflecting the diverse influences that shaped his artistic development. While undeniably rooted in Dutch traditions – particularly the meticulous landscapes of Jacob van Ruisdael and the refined compositions of Roghman – his work also exhibits a distinctly English sensibility. The influence of Carel Fabritius, a contemporary painter who tragically died young, is evident in Griffier’s use of perspective and his attention to detail. However, Griffier's style diverges from Fabritius through a greater emphasis on color and a willingness to incorporate fantastical elements into his compositions. His later works, particularly those created during his time in London, are characterized by an almost dreamlike quality – a blend of realistic observation and imaginative invention. The incorporation of exotic animals, such as the turkey featured prominently in “A Turkey and other Fowl in a Park,” suggests a fascination with the exotic and a desire to transcend the limitations of purely topographical representation.

    Legacy and Historical Significance

    Jan Griffier I’s legacy lies not only in his impressive body of work but also in his role as a cultural observer and recorder of a pivotal period in English history. His paintings provide invaluable documentation of London's transformation following the Great Fire, offering a unique perspective on the city’s architectural development, social life, and artistic trends. His return to Holland in 1695, followed by a final return to London, underscores his adaptability and his enduring fascination with both cultures. Griffier’s career demonstrates how artists can navigate cultural boundaries, adapting their skills and sensibilities to new environments while retaining a distinctive artistic voice. He remains an important figure in the history of Dutch art, representing a fascinating synthesis of influences that produced a truly unique and captivating style.

    Lees meer op

    Online beschikbaar

    QR-code die linkt naar de downloadpagina van Mercury

    wahooart.com/nl/art/download/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/

    Bronvermelding voor dit kunstwerk

    MLA
    clève, corneille van. Mercury. n.d., https://wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/
    APA
    clève, corneille van (n.d.). Mercury [Painting]. https://wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/
    Chicago
    corneille van clève. Mercury. n.d. https://wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/
    Harvard
    clève, corneille van (n.d.) Mercury. Available at: https://wahooart.com/nl/art/corneille-van-cleve-mercury-9CW6W4-en/

    Kijk goed naar

    Mercury — corneille van clève

    Kijk goed naar

    Beantwoord in je eigen woorden. Er zijn hier geen foute antwoorden — alleen antwoorden die je kunt toelichten.

    1. Wat valt u als eerste op, en waarom?
    2. Welke kleuren of vormen bepalen de sfeer — en wat is die sfeer?
    3. Hoeveel gezichten kun je vinden? ____ (onze catalogus telt 1 — ben je het ermee eens?)
    4. In onze catalogus is dit werk geclassificeerd onder: myths. Bent u het hiermee eens? Wat zou u toevoegen of weglaten?
    5. Kijk nog eens naar Holy Family, eerder in deze gids. Noem twee overeenkomsten met dit werk en één verschil.

    Uw reactie

    Schrijf een korte paragraaf over dit kunstwerk. Gebruik hiervoor de feiten uit de eerdere delen van deze gids en uw bovenstaande antwoorden.