Paper

Student Artwork Guide

No. 2

Name Class Date

Mark Rothko, No. 2 (1964). Reproduced for reference; rights reserved by the rights holder. See this canvas under a moving light: the drawing, the true colour under the varnish, the bare pigment

The facts

Artist
Mark Rothko wahooart.com/en/artists/mark-rothko/
Artist’s dates
1903 – 1970
Painted
1964
Medium
Oil On Canvas
Original size
267 x 203 cm
Movement
Color Field Painting Huge areas of flat, soft colour meant to be felt rather than read as a picture of anything.
Period
Modern
Artistic style
Minimalism
Influences
Color Field Painting
Notable elements or techniques
Layered washes; Subtle tonal gradations
Subject or theme
Abstraction

In context

No. 2 — Mark Rothko

How big is it?

The original measures 267 × 203 cm (height × width), drawn here beside an adult of average height. It is too large to draw to scale on this page.

When was this painted?

  1. 1900
  2. 1910
  3. 1920
  4. 1930
  5. 1940
  6. 1950
  7. 1960
  8. 1970

Row above: the years. Row below: how old the artist was at the start and at the end of each span — 0 at birth, 67 at death.

Painted when the artist was 61. The artist lived to 67. 145 of the 168 dated works by this artist in our catalogue came earlier.

Shaded: the lifetime of Mark Rothko (1903–1970) ▲ this work, 1964 every dated painting, decade by decade

First works: up to 1945 Main working years: 1945–1958 Late works: from 1958

Those three bands split the works this catalogue has a date for into a first quarter, a middle half and a last quarter. They are not the artist’s complete output: a thin stretch may be a gap in the record rather than a quiet spell. The same years with the artist’s life laid along them

Compare with

  • White Center, 1950 wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-white-center-8BWUHU-en/
  • No.1 wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-no-1-8XYHLG-en/
  • Untitled, 1968 wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-untitled-D2DR7X-en/

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: wahooart.com/en/art/similar/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Phthalo Green #2e2b2b

    Catalogued palette

    • #2E2B2B
    • #393533
    • #43413F
    • #3D3A38

    These colours inside the artist’s whole palette Find other paintings by colour

    Palette
    Monochrome The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Phthalo Green
    Intensity
    Monochromatic How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Serene How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Discordant Palette How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Deep_shadow How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Muted How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    Where in the world is this painting looked at?

    • under 1%
    • 1–3%
    • 3–8%
    • 8–20%
    • 20% and over
    This painting alone has too few recorded visitors to map, so the plate reads every work by Mark Rothko over the last twelve months — 46 countries in all. Where these figures come from

    The ten leading countries

    1. 1 China 32.6%
    2. 2 Italy 17.9%
    3. 3 United States of America 7.7%
    4. 4 Brazil 5.3%
    5. 5 France 4.7%
    6. 6 Germany 4.1%
    7. 7 Greece 3.7%
    8. 8 Netherlands 3.0%
    9. 9 Spain 2.2%
    10. 10 United Kingdom 1.8%
    11. · 36 other countries 17.0%

    Find the three darkest countries on the map. Is the museum that keeps this painting in any of them? Write down one reason people far away might look at it.

    The 20 most looked-at works by Mark Rothko

    1. 1 White Center, 1950 8.0%
    2. 2 No.61 (Rust and Blue), 1953 7.1%
    3. 3 Red and Orange 3.2%
    4. 4 Orange and yellow, 1956 3.2%
    5. 5 No.1 3.1%
    6. 6 Three 2.8%
    7. 7 AUTUMN 2.8%
    8. 8 No. 5 No. 22 2.5%
    9. 9 No. 13 (White, Red on Yellow), 1958 2.1%
    10. 10 Violet, Black, Orange, Yellow on White and Red, 1949 2.0%
    11. 11 Abstract painting 2.0%
    12. 12 Untitled, 1970 1.9%
    13. 13 Blue and gray, 1970 1.6%
    14. 14 No.8, 1952 1.5%
    15. 15 Orange and Red on Red 1.4%
    16. 16 Four Darks in Red, 1958 1.3%
    17. 17 Slow Swirl at the Edge of the Sea, 1944 1.3%
    18. 18 Untitled, 1964 1.3%
    19. 19 Entrance to Subway (Subway Station.Subway Scene) 1.2%
    20. 137 No. 2, 1964 this painting 0.2%

    Together these works take 50.5% of all the attention this artist's paintings received over the last twelve months. The catalogue holds 460 works by this artist, of which 267 were looked at at least once. This painting ranks 137 of them, with 0.2% of that attention. The same counts, month by month

    Bars measure attention, not quality. Pick the work at the top and this one: name one thing that might make a painting famous beyond how well it is painted.

    About this artwork

    No. 2 — Mark Rothko

    A Meditation in Gray: The Ethereal Depth of Rothko’s No. 2

    In the vast landscape of Abstract Expressionism, few works command the room with such quiet, monumental authority as Mark Rothko’s No. 2. Completed in 1964, this masterpiece serves as a profound cornerstone of Color Field Painting, inviting the viewer into a realm where color transcends mere pigment to become an emotional experience. The composition is deceptively simple, presenting two rectangular blocks of muted gray hues stacked vertically against a darker, more somber background. Yet, beneath this minimalist surface lies a complex interplay of light and shadow that demands a slow, contemplative gaze.

    The power of No. 2 resides in its ability to evoke an atmosphere of stillness. There is no representational imagery to distract the eye, no recognizable figures to anchor the mind; instead, Rothko directs our attention toward the pure materiality of color itself. The grayscale palette is meticulously calibrated, offering a spectrum of tones that suggest a sense of depth and luminosity without the need for traditional perspective. As one stands before this large-scale canvas, the soft edges of the rectangles seem to vibrate, creating a sensation that the forms are hovering like mist or receding into an infinite void.

    Technique and the Architecture of Emotion

    To understand the mesmerizing quality of No. 2, one must consider the artist's meticulous technique. Rothko did not simply apply paint to canvas; he built layers of atmosphere. By utilizing thin washes of oil and acrylic media, he achieved a delicate translucency that allows light to appear as if it is emanating from within the work itself. This method of layering—often referred to as veiling—creates subtle tonal gradations that blur the boundaries between shapes, contributing to the painting's characteristic sense of atmospheric depth.

    This technical mastery serves a deeper symbolic purpose. Emerging from the post-war era, a period marked by existential anxiety and a search for meaning, No. 2 reflects a broader artistic preoccupation with the fundamental human experience. While some critics have interpreted the stark, geometric forms as representations of the void or the absence of form—symbolizing the anxieties of mortality—Rothko himself sought to evoke feelings of transcendence and spiritual communion. For the collector or the interior designer, this work offers more than just a sophisticated aesthetic; it provides a focal point for introspection, a sanctuary of calm that can transform a space into a site of profound psychological resonance.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    Mark Rothko

    Born in Daugavpils, Latvia

    A Life Shaped by Displacement

    Mark Rothko arrived in the United States as a young boy, part of a family moving from Dvinsk, Latvia, to Portland, Oregon, in 1913. His early years were marked by the heavy atmosphere of the Pale of Settlement, where his family lived amidst political unrest and the fear of pogroms. This sense of instability followed him across the ocean. The loss of his father, Jacob, shortly after their arrival in America added a layer of personal grief to the challenges of settling in a new culture. While he studied at Yale University, the pull of New York City eventually led him to leave formal academics behind for the Art Students League.

    His upbringing was one of intellect and debate. His father, a pharmacist with socialist leanings, fostered a home where learning was central. This environment, combined with the hardships of the immigrant experience, created a deep sensitivity to human suffering. These early experiences of loss and the struggle to find a place in a chaotic world became the quiet foundation for everything he would later paint.

    From Figures to Fields of Color

    In his early years in New York, Rothko focused on realism, painting portraits and urban scenes with careful attention to detail. As the 1940s brought the horrors of World War II, his work began to shift. He moved away from recognizable objects, looking instead toward Surrealism and mythology to find a way to express universal human emotions. During this period, his canvases featured biomorphic shapes that seemed to float between being figures and being abstract forms.

    By the late 1940s, he had developed the style that would define his career. He stripped away all imagery, leaving only large-scale canvases with rectangular blocks of color. These forms appeared to hover and resonate against one another. He used thin washes of paint to create subtle changes in tone and texture, making the edges of his shapes appear blurred. He often avoided titles, using simple numbers like No. 1 or No. 6 so that viewers could face the work without any preconceived ideas.

    The Search for Emotional Truth

    Rothko’s mature period is associated with Color Field painting. His goal was to use color to speak directly to the human soul, bypassing the intellect to reach deep emotions such as tragedy, ecstasy, and despair. He meticulously layered paint to create a sense of depth and light that seemed to come from within the canvas itself. These large works were intended to envelop the viewer in an immersive experience.

    His commitment to this emotional honesty led to several significant projects:

    The Seagram Murals, which he originally intended for a New York restaurant but later donated to the Tate Gallery after feeling the setting would compromise the work.

    The Rothko Chapel in Houston, Texas, a non-denominational space containing fourteen of his paintings in varying shades of black, designed as a place for quiet reflection.

    The Harvard Mural series, which were donated to a dining room at the Holyoke Center.

    Despite his immense influence on Abstract Expressionism and the later Minimalist movement, Rothko struggled with depression throughout his life. He died by suicide in 1970. His work remains a central part of modern art history, found in permanent collections such as the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Tate Modern in London.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for No. 2

    wahooart.com/en/art/download/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    Rothko, Mark. No. 2. 1964, https://wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/
    APA
    Rothko, Mark (1964). No. 2 [Painting]. https://wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/
    Chicago
    Mark Rothko. No. 2. 1964. https://wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/
    Harvard
    Rothko, Mark (1964) No. 2. Available at: https://wahooart.com/en/art/mark-rothko-no-2-D3JR9W-en/

    Look closely

    No. 2 — Mark Rothko

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Our catalogue files this work under: minimalism, geometric abstraction, emotion. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    4. Look back at White Center (1950), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    5. Color Field Painting: Huge areas of flat, soft colour meant to be felt rather than read as a picture of anything. Where can you see that in this work?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.

    Art quiz

    No. 2 — Mark Rothko

    How well do you know this artwork?

    Tick one answer for each of the 5 questions below. Each has exactly one correct answer.

    1. 1. What is the primary technique used by Mark Rothko to create the tonal gradations in 'No. 2'?

      • A Layering thin washes of oil paint
      • B Using thick, sculptural impasto
      • C Applying heavy industrial acrylics
    2. 2. What are the dimensions of the canvas for 'No. 2'?

      • A 100 x 80 cm
      • B 267 x 203 cm
      • C 500 x 400 cm
    3. 3. In which year was 'No. 2' completed?

      • A 1948
      • B 1958
      • C 1964
    4. 4. Which artistic movement is 'No. 2' considered a cornerstone of?

      • A Surrealism
      • B Color Field Painting
      • C Cubism
    5. 5. What geometric forms are used in the composition of this painting?

      • A Two rectangular blocks
      • B Three circular shapes
      • C A single large triangle

    My score: ____ out of 5

    Answer key — for the teacher

    This starts a fresh printed page, so it can simply be left out of the copies.

    1A · 2B · 3C · 4B · 5A

    Check any answer against the catalogue record for this painting

    Questions & Answers

    What other names is Mark Rothko known by?

    Mark Rothko is also known as Marcus Rothkowitz, Markus Yakovlevich Rothkowitz.

    What palette and what feeling does "No. 2" combine?

    The monochrome palette of "No. 2" by Mark Rothko goes together with its melancholic emotional tone. Color is one of the ways a work conveys feeling.

    Does "No. 2" by Mark Rothko use strong contrasts or soft harmonies?

    The color composition of "No. 2" by Mark Rothko combines a serene contrast with a discordant palette harmony.