Paper

Student Artwork Guide

King David

Name Class Date

Marc Chagall, King David (1963). Reproduced for reference; rights reserved by the rights holder. See this canvas under a moving light: the drawing, the true colour under the varnish, the bare pigment

The facts

Artist
Marc Chagall wahooart.com/en/artists/marc-chagall/
Artist’s dates
1887 – 1985
Painted
1963
Medium
Oil On Canvas
Original size
179 x 98 cm
Movement
Naïve Art Work by artists without formal training, flat and direct, valued for exactly that freshness.
Period
Modern
Artistic style
Expressionist
Influences
Hasidic Judaism
Notable elements
Ghostly figure, harp
Subject or theme
Biblical

In context

King David — Marc Chagall

How big is it?

The original measures 179 × 98 cm (height × width), drawn here beside an adult of average height. It is too large to draw to scale on this page.

When was this painted?

  1. 1880
  2. 1890
  3. 1900
  4. 1910
  5. 1920
  6. 1930
  7. 1940
  8. 1950
  9. 1960
  10. 1970
  11. 1980

Row above: the years. Row below: how old the artist was at the start and at the end of each span — 0 at birth, 98 at death.

Painted when the artist was 76. The artist lived to 98. 548 of the 878 dated works by this artist in our catalogue came earlier.

Shaded: the lifetime of Marc Chagall (1887–1985) ▲ this work, 1963 every dated painting, decade by decade

First works: up to 1930 Main working years: 1930–1965 Late works: from 1965

Those three bands split the works this catalogue has a date for into a first quarter, a middle half and a last quarter. They are not the artist’s complete output: a thin stretch may be a gap in the record rather than a quiet spell. The same years with the artist’s life laid along them

Compare with

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: wahooart.com/en/art/similar/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Espresso #684a3e

    Catalogued palette

    • #684A3E
    • #DDDFE1
    • #313434
    • #928F85

    These colours inside the artist’s whole palette Find other paintings by colour

    Palette
    Earthy The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Espresso
    Intensity
    Monochromatic How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Balanced How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Discordant Palette How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Shadow How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Muted How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    Where in the world is this painting looked at?

    • under 1%
    • 1–3%
    • 3–8%
    • 8–20%
    • 20% and over
    This painting alone has too few recorded visitors to map, so the plate reads every work by Marc Chagall over the last twelve months — 75 countries in all. Where these figures come from

    The ten leading countries

    1. 1 China 32.6%55,000 visits
    2. 2 Germany 5.6%9,500 visits
    3. 3 United States of America 5.0%8,400 visits
    4. 4 France 4.7%8,000 visits
    5. 5 Italy 4.0%6,800 visits
    6. 6 Netherlands 3.3%5,500 visits
    7. 7 Spain 3.0%5,100 visits
    8. 8 Poland 2.5%4,300 visits
    9. 9 Brazil 2.4%4,100 visits
    10. 10 South Korea 2.3%3,900 visits
    11. · 65 other countries 34.6%58,200 visits

    Find the three darkest countries on the map. Is the museum that keeps this painting in any of them? Write down one reason people far away might look at it.

    The 20 most looked-at works by Marc Chagall

    1. 1 I and the Village, 1911 10.6%29,500 visits
    2. 2 The Birthday, 1915 8.8%24,500 visits
    3. 3 Over the town, 1918 4.9%13,600 visits
    4. 4 The Green Violinist, 1924 3.1%8,600 visits
    5. 5 Adam and Eve expelled from Paradise, 1961 1.2%3,400 visits
    6. 6 The Concert, 1957 1.2%3,300 visits
    7. 7 The Fall of Icarus, 1975 1.1%3,000 visits
    8. 8 Midsummer Night's Dream, 1939 1.0%2,800 visits
    9. 9 Liberation, 1952 0.9%2,600 visits
    10. 10 Paris through the Window, 1913 0.9%2,600 visits
    11. 11 Song of Songs III (8), 1960 0.9%2,400 visits
    12. 12 Dans mon pays 0.8%2,300 visits
    13. 13 The return of the prodigal son, 1975 0.8%2,100 visits
    14. 14 The Promenade, 1918 0.7%2,000 visits
    15. 15 The Lovers, 1929 0.7%1,900 visits
    16. 16 The Praying Jew (Rabbi of Vitebsk), 1914 0.7%1,900 visits
    17. 17 The Falling Angel, 1947 0.6%1,800 visits
    18. 18 Abraham and three Angels, 1966 0.6%1,800 visits
    19. 19 Moses with the Burning Bush, 1966 0.6%1,700 visits
    20. — King David, 1963 this painting 0.0%0 visits

    Together these works take 40.1% of all the attention this artist's paintings received over the last twelve months. The catalogue holds 906 works by this artist, of which 591 were looked at at least once. This painting has not been looked at yet in that time — it closes the list without a rank. The same counts, month by month

    Bars measure attention, not quality. Pick the work at the top and this one: name one thing that might make a painting famous beyond how well it is painted.

    About this artwork

    King David — Marc Chagall

    The Genesis of a Masterpiece: Marc Chagall’s ‘King David’ (1963)

    Marc Chagall, born Moishe Shagal in 1887 in Liozna, Belarus, wasn't merely a painter; he was a poet of color, a weaver of dreams, and a chronicler of memory. His life, spanning nearly a century, mirrored the tumultuous currents of the 20th century, yet his art remained steadfastly rooted in a deeply personal vision—one infused with the folklore of his Hasidic Jewish upbringing and an unwavering belief in the power of imagination. Vitebsk itself was more than just a birthplace; it became the emotional core of his artistic universe, a recurring motif populated by flying figures, whimsical animals, and the vibrant hues of remembered landscapes. The town’s unique blend of cultures—Russian Orthodox churches alongside bustling Jewish marketplaces—forged an aesthetic sensibility that would defy easy categorization throughout his long career. ‘King David,’ painted in 1963, exemplifies this deeply personal approach, a testament to Chagall's ability to translate profound spiritual and cultural themes into a visually arresting and emotionally resonant work.

    (Image: King David, 1963 - Marc Chagall - WikiArt.org)

    A Vision in Naïve Art and Biblical Weight

    This monumental oil on canvas, measuring 179.8 x 98 cm, is a prime example of what critics have termed Chagall’s “Naïve Art” or “Primitivism.” Rejecting the conventions of academic realism, Chagall employed bold colors, simplified forms, and a dreamlike quality to convey his deeply felt emotions and spiritual experiences. The painting eschews precise detail in favor of expressive lines and symbolic imagery—a deliberate choice that allows the viewer to connect with the work on an intuitive level. The grayscale lithograph version (referenced in WahooArt’s database) highlights this, emphasizing the dramatic scale and expressive lines, evoking a sense of biblical weight and solemnity.

    Symbolism and Narrative: A Dance of Figures

    At the heart of ‘King David’ stands the iconic figure of the biblical monarch himself. Dressed in a vibrant red robe—a color often associated with royalty and divine power—he plays his lyre, a symbol of music, poetry, and kingship. However, the scene is far from static. A ghostly woman, seemingly emerging from the shadows, stands beside him, her presence adding an element of mystery and perhaps representing David’s past or a spiritual guide. Several other figures populate the composition: one holding what appears to be a bird—a recurring motif in Chagall's work often symbolizing freedom and aspiration—and others engaged in conversation or seemingly lost in contemplation. The background features a stylized townscape beneath a crescent moon, further enhancing the painting’s dreamlike atmosphere and connecting it to the biblical narrative of David’s reign.

    Historical Context and Artistic Legacy

    Created in 1963, during a period of significant personal reflection for Chagall, ‘King David’ reflects his lifelong fascination with Jewish history, mythology, and spirituality. It builds upon the earlier 'King David (II Samuel, VI, 4 5)' lithograph from 1956, demonstrating a continued exploration of this iconic biblical figure. The painting draws inspiration from the Book of Samuel, but Chagall’s interpretation transcends mere illustration; he imbues the scene with his own unique vision and emotional intensity. Chagall's work, including pieces like ‘King David,’ has been celebrated for its ability to bridge the gap between religious faith and artistic expression, making it a cornerstone of 20th-century art. The painting’s enduring appeal lies in its capacity to evoke a sense of wonder, mystery, and profound emotional resonance—a testament to Chagall's genius as both an artist and a poet of color.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    Marc Chagall

    Born in Liovana, Belarus

    Early Life, Family and Training

    Marc Chagall enters the world on July 7, 1887, in Vitebsk, Russian Empire, born Moishe Segal. He is the first of nine children in a modest Jewish family. Life is defined by the rhythms of labor and small-scale commerce. His father, Khatskel Segal, works as a herring pickler at a warehouse, while his mother, Feïga-Ita Tchernina, manages a small grocery store. These early years are rooted in the specific textures of a provincial town, where the boundaries of his world are shaped by the needs of a large household and the traditions of his community.

    Education begins within the walls of the heder, a traditional Jewish elementary school. Here, the focus remains on religious instruction and the foundational texts of his upbringing. By age thirteen, the scope of his learning shifts toward the secular. He enters Vitebsk’s official middle school to pursue a Russian education, a move that marks a departure from the strictly religious sphere of his childhood. This dual existence—between the sacred traditions of the heder and the secular requirements of the state school—creates a tension that defines his early development.

    Artistic impulse finds its first formal outlet in Vitebsk. Chagall receives his initial training at a local art school operated by Iouri Pen. It is here that the raw instinct for visual expression begins to coalesce into a disciplined practice. He moves from the structured lessons of the classroom toward a more profound engagement with the act of seeing, setting the stage for a life spent translating memory into form.

    The Formative Years in St. Petersburg

    The transition from the provincial quiet of Vitebsk to the imperial scale of Saint-Petersburg is marked by struggle. Between 1907 and 1909, the capital offers little in the way of comfort. Poverty is a constant companion; there are moments of hunger so severe that physical collapse becomes a reality. To survive, he takes to the streets, earning a meager living by drawing shop signs. These commercial tasks provide the necessary rubles to sustain a presence in the city while he navigates the complexities of being a Jewish student in a vast, shifting empire.

    The academic pursuit is relentless. He enrolls in several academies, seeking a formal structure for his burgeoning visual language. The atmosphere of the capital is heavy with the influence of the avant-garde, a tension that pulls him away from classical training. He finds himself in the studio of Léon Bakst, a designer for the Ballets Russes, where the theatricality of set design begins to seep into his perception of space and form. This period is a collision of necessity and ambition, a time of sketching for survival while simultaneously absorbing the radical shifts occurring in the Russian art scene.

    The Paris Years and Avant-Garde Influence

    Paris arrives in 1910 or 1911, a sudden shift from the provincial constraints of the Russian Empire. The city offers a sensory shock. He finds light, color, and liberty in the streets of Montparnasse. This is no longer the world of the herring merchant or the traditional heder school; it is a landscape of radical possibility. He settles in La Ruche, the famous artist's residence, where the air is thick with the presence of the new avant-garde. He shares this space with Amedeo Modigliani and Fernand Léger, figures who are redefining the boundaries of modern expression. The influence of the era is inescapable, yet he remains an outlier, absorbing the discoveries of Fauvism and Cubism without surrendering his own internal logic.

    The work produced during this period begins to reflect a departure from literal representation. He moves toward a style that prioritizes emotional and poetic associations over the strict rules of pictorial logic. The colors brighten, fueled by the exposure to the Parisian scene. He navigates the tension between the formal training of his past and the experimental freedom of the present. This period of intense creative friction continues until the political upheavals of the war pull him back toward the East. It is not until 1923 that he returns to Paris with his family, re-establishing his presence in the city that first unlocked his visual language.

    The Betrothed and Eiffel Tower (1913)

    Hommage à Apollinaire (1912-1913)

    The Russian Years and Revolution

    The revolution pulls Chagall back to Vitebsk. He does not merely observe the upheaval; he attempts to shape its cultural landscape. He takes on the mantle of Vitebsk Commissioner of Fine Arts and assumes the directorship of a local Fine Arts School. His vision is one of community and education, yet the political climate shifts beneath his feet. The rise of Suprematism creates a fracture. Figures like Malevitch and Lissitzky push for a radical, non-objective abstraction that clashes with Chagall’s more lyrical, figurative approach. The tension is unsustainable. He is forced out of his positions, his dream of a localized artistic renaissance colliding with the rigid demands of the new regime.

    By 1920, the focus shifts to Moscow. He works on the decoration of the Jewish theatre, a project that captures the intersection of his personal identity and the public stage. His lines are confident, his colors strong and pale, even as the world around him fractures. He navigates a period of intense creative output and profound material struggle, moving between the memory of the shtetl and the demands of a changing state. The era is defined by this friction: the attempt to build a cultural home while the very foundations of his world are being rewritten.

    Over the Town (1914–1918)

    Apparition (about 1917-18)

    Life in the United States

    The outbreak of World War II forces a sudden shift in geography. In 1941, Chagall and his family seek refuge in the United States, fleeing the instability of occupied France. He settles in and around New York City, a period of residence that lasts until 1948. The city provides a backdrop of profound emotional upheaval. Amidst the anxieties of the war years, his brush captures the tension of a world in flux. The work reflects the uncertainty of the era, translating personal and global unrest into a visual language of suffering and hope.

    During these seven years, the artist finds a way to engage with large-scale institutional projects. He undertakes major commissions for the United Nations headquarters, translating his poetic vision into the architectural fabric of a global institution. This period in America marks a significant chapter of experimentation and survival, bridging his European roots with a new, intense reality. He remains a man between worlds, his heart still pulling him toward France even as he navigates the complexities of his American exile.

    White Crucifixion (1938)

    Technique and Artistic Style

    Logic yields to emotion. Chagall rejects the rigid rules of pictorial logic, choosing instead to compose images through poetic association. His canvases operate on the mechanics of a dream. Figures float through the air, defying gravity, while colors pulse with a non-naturalistic intensity. This approach allows him to capture the essence of feeling rather than the literal appearance of the world. He moves beyond mere imitation, using a bold palette to translate memory into a visual language.

    His aesthetic is a collision of influences. He absorbs the fragmented structures of Cubism and the intense color of Fauvism, yet he filters these avant-garde movements through a deeply personal lens. The result is a style that bridges Expressionism and abstraction. He weaves together the sacred and the mundane, populating his scenes with symbolic and surreal imagery. Jewish folktales and the quiet, lived-in details of shtetl life become the building blocks of a private mythology. The familiar becomes fantastic.

    The imagery often centers on recurring motifs: flying lovers, fiddlers, and massive bouquets. These elements are not mere decorations but symbols of a spiritual and emotional landscape. In works like The Lovers (1929), the sense of weightlessness and the use of intense color create a space where the physical laws of the world no longer apply. His work remains a constant negotiation between the tangible reality of his upbringing and the boundless possibilities of the imagination.

    I and the Village (1911)

    The Green Violinist (1924)

    White Crucifixion (1938)

    Patrons, Workshop and Commissions

    The mid-1920s find Chagall in Paris, navigating the influential circles of the art market. He enters the orbit of Ambroise Vollard, a dealer whose influence shapes the trajectory of many avant-garde artists. Vollard commissions a series of engravings from Chagall, tasking him with illustrating the works of Nikolay Gogol, specifically Dead Souls. This period marks a shift toward the precision of printmaking, moving away from the fluid spontaneity of his earlier canvases.

    In 1931, the focus shifts toward the Middle East. The Mayor of Tel Aviv extends an invitation to Chagall to travel to Palestine. The objective is ambitious: the founding of a Jewish Art Museum. This period deepens his engagement with religious and cultural symbolism, a theme that would persist through his later, large-scale architectural works. His ability to translate personal and communal memory into physical space becomes a defining aspect of his professional output.

    As his reputation grows, the scale of his work expands from the intimate page to the monumental. He moves into the realm of light and architecture, designing stained-glass windows for the Cathedral of Metz and the United Nations building in New York. These works demand a mastery of how color interacts with sunlight. In 1964, he reaches a peak of public recognition with a commission for the ceiling of the Paris Opera, a massive undertaking that brings his dreamlike imagery into one of Europe's most significant cultural venues.

    Where to See the Works Today

    The legacy of his vision remains anchored in several key institutions across the globe. In Nice, France, the Musée National Marc Chagall houses an extensive collection of his works, preserving the core of his creative output. This museum offers a concentrated look at the imagery that defined his long career. Meanwhile, the State Russian Museum in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, maintains a significant presence of his art, holding pieces that connect back to his early years and his time in the Russian Empire.

    The reach of his work extends across the Atlantic to the United States. The Museum of Modern Art in New York City holds works that reflect his complex relationship with the city during his years of exile. In the American Midwest, the Art Institute of Chicago features his art, ensuring his presence in major international collections. These locations provide the primary physical touchpoints for those seeking to encounter his specific use of color and form.

    I and the Village (1911)

    The Wedding (1944)

    White Crucifixion (1938)

    The Lovers (1929)

    The Circus (1964)

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for King David

    wahooart.com/en/art/download/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    Chagall, Marc. King David. 1963, https://wahooart.com/en/art/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/
    APA
    Chagall, Marc (1963). King David [Painting]. https://wahooart.com/en/art/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/
    Chicago
    Marc Chagall. King David. 1963. https://wahooart.com/en/art/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/
    Harvard
    Chagall, Marc (1963) King David. Available at: https://wahooart.com/en/art/marc-chagall-king-david-8XYGPT-en/

    Look closely

    King David — Marc Chagall

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Our catalogue files this work under: king david, biblical, harp. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    4. Look back at I and the Village (1911), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    5. Naïve Art: Work by artists without formal training, flat and direct, valued for exactly that freshness. Where can you see that in this work?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.

    Art quiz

    King David — Marc Chagall

    How well do you know this artwork?

    Tick one answer for each of the 5 questions below. Each has exactly one correct answer.

    1. 1. What artistic movement is most closely associated with Marc Chagall’s ‘King David’?

      • A Cubism
      • B Naïve Art (Primitivism)
      • C Surrealism
    2. 2. The painting depicts King David playing which instrument?

      • A A trumpet
      • B A lute
      • C A harp
    3. 3. What is the approximate date of creation for ‘King David’?

      • A 1923
      • B 1956
      • C 1963
    4. 4. The image description mentions several figures besides King David. What does one of the figures holding resemble?

      • A A bird
      • B A sword
      • C A crown
    5. 5. Based on the description, what is a key characteristic of Chagall’s style evident in this painting?

      • A Strict realism and detailed depiction
      • B A dreamlike quality and symbolic representation
      • C Geometric abstraction and fragmented forms

    My score: ____ out of 5

    Answer key — for the teacher

    This starts a fresh printed page, so it can simply be left out of the copies.

    1B · 2C · 3C · 4A · 5A

    Check any answer against the catalogue record for this painting

    Questions & Answers

    Where is "King David" suggested to be displayed, considering its palette?

    With its earthy palette, "King David" by Marc Chagall is recommended for a living room. The colors are part of the reason for this suggestion.

    Is a download available for "King David"?

    The image of "King David" by Marc Chagall can be downloaded from the artwork's Download page: a high-resolution digital image download.

    Can I see "King David" by Marc Chagall under different lights?

    The X-Ray page of "King David" by Marc Chagall is an interactive viewer that lets you slide through eleven optical layers of the artwork's image, including an X-ray style view.